What Next? 

​Gareth Southgate has finally taken charge of games as the permanent manager this week and it was a good week for the three lions. An encouraging display against Germany in Dortmund followed by a good win against Lithuania at Wembley yester night. We can see some aspects of Southgate’s imprint on the team but one thing we are noticing is that there is progress. So what should Southgate sort out before the next round of international matches?

1. A definite style of play.

Southgate has tinkered with the team quite a lot since his appointment but his favoured formation has always been 4-2-3-1 where the front three sort of tuck in and give more space for the fullbacks to fly forward. However after the Slovenia game in October, we felt it proving to be a problem with England as the movement wasn’t that swift and the game was for most parts, dull.

Against Germany, he lined up with a 3-4-3 formation and it was excellent to say the least.  It has to be said that England did not deserve to lose. Michael Keane has to be singled out for his performance that night. For you to make your full international debut against the world champions and come out without any blame surely can’t go unnoticed. It will be interesting to watch him in the next few games.

On Sunday Southgate marshalled a 4-2-3-1 formation and there were a few jitters about the formation but to some extent it worked. It’s nice to note that the players are actually flexible to handle the tactical switch. Going forward it will be interesting to see what Southgate sticks to. He wasn’t very outgoing in his post-match press conference by claiming England is at an advantage in that they can shift their formation so it will keep teams guessing.

I would rather the 4-2-3-1 formation as it actually encourages a lot of build-up from the midfield where the bulk of England’s talent lies. It will prove to be a difficult formation to resort to if the opposition actually come out as it means the fullbacks have to go back and the wide players need to track their markers which is probably not their strongest asset.

2. Player Call-ups

There were definitely eyebrows raised when Theo Walcott wasn’t selected for this round of international matches despite being the second highest scoring Englishman. Southgate claimed that Theo had been given his chance the last time and he was unable to replicate his club form. He also added that he had more options in Barkley and Rashford and was looking to try something new. Wayne was also left out though why this was a shock to people I don’t know. Southgate got a lot of stick for selecting Livermore but look around and notice anyone who watched the game against Germany has changed their stance about Livermore. The boy was efficient with his passing and tackling. 

Not Mr Nice Guy after all eh? He is a man keen to stamp his personality on the team and the train carrying joyriders seems to be slowing down to a halt. However it will be important for some consistency so as to ensure that partnerships and chemistry are built. He’s got to have a definite spine in the team on which to build the rest of the team. The team will be built around Harry Kane because his outrageous goal return so far demands that. Alli has also started curving his own niche as the first choice number ten and it hard to see him being dropped for anyone else. 

However the rest of the squad needs to follow suit.

3. The Rooney situation.

The one thing that has refused to go away for Southgate. I feel it’s unfair that Southgate has to deal with Rooney at every press release yet Mourinho rarely has to deal with the same. Deep down we all know there’s no way Wayne is usurping any person selected to play number 10. Alli and Lallana have excellent movement and Rooney’s lack of pace is definitely something that’s in stark contrast to the rest of the number 10 contenders. A call-up should be as a result of form and not status. He’s captain and record goal scorer but how does that affect England for the 90 minutesif he lasts that long that he is on a pitch?

Southgate however still insists that Rooney has a future role in his team and still regards him as his permanent captain. Whether he is simply delaying the inevitable or is simply according him the necessary respect remains to be seen.

4. Jermain Defoe.

This was definitely a shock call-up. Southgate really took a gamble by placing his trust on the Sunderland forward. He referred to him as a natural and someone who knows his way around goal so there was nothing to teach. Thankfully his plan did not go awry and he was rewarded with a goal early on with Defoe admitting the manager had backed him to score that day. Hats off to Defoe for displaying the professionalism that he’s always possessed. However the hype about his continued presence should be contained.

His last involvement was in 2013 and one might argue his sudden exile from the national team was too sudden. However we need to come to terms with the fact that he is 34 years old. By the time the World Cup will be coming around, he will be a few months shy of his 36th birthday.

Going back to the issue of formation, both the 3-4-3 and 4-2-3-1 demand a lot of movement across the front three and front four respectively. It’s the only way players e.g. Lallana and Vardy will have a chance at goal. The full impact of the front three was felt in the Germany game where Vardy, Alli and Lallana kept switching all half long and Alli should have done better in trying to beat Ter Stegen and Lallana hit the post. Defoe thrived in the 4-2-3-1 situation but in the event the manager wants something else, he will stick out like a sore thumb.

Not to take away his positives. He is the 22nd player to reach 20 goals for England so surely that has to count for something. He is what you want to be in the box. His poaching instincts are a beauty and he must be applauded for his impeccable positioning but I simply believe England has more to offer than to rely on the 34 year old.

Southgate alluded to this by admitting that they should have moved the ball quickly and the runs in behind the defence were not enough, something that definitely changed once Rashford and Vardy came on. 

5. His Back Four

Much has always been made about England’s back four and for good measure it must be said. The pairings have just not been good enough and have been susceptible for individual mistakes or just looked alien. Cahill against Germany was susceptible for Podolski’s goal. Take nothing away from the finish but I think Cahill should have done better than just stand there and be used as a wall and Hart saw it too late. There was simply no way of keeping that out still.

I don’t want to rush it but Michael Keane was phenomenal over the course of the two games. It’s not a system he is used to but he took it like a duck to water. He was also excellent next to Stones yesterday and they hardly put a foot wrong all game long. Cahill is 31 while Keane and Stones are in their mid-20s. It might be seen as too early to decide on this but I think they would make a good base for the national team. Both are comfortable on the ball which will go a long way in implementing Southgate’s all-passing team. Walker is definitely first and second choice RB, probably even third! His movement up and down the right side is a joy to watch and it is simply an honour watching such an athlete doing his job. Keeping him fit is definitely of importance. The LB position is still of worry. Danny Rose is definitely first choice but his deputies need to pull up their socks. Bertrand did a good job this past week. Shaw needs to take the little chance he gets to justify his position if at all he is called upon next.

13 out of 15 points at the halfway stage is not a bad return. The job is far from done as England must learn to replicate its qualification form to the major events that they go otherwise they will simply be regarded as minnow participants. For now, England is far from good enough, but under Southgate, fans have a reason to smile.   



If there was another word I could use to describe the England national team, it would definitely be Rapunzel. Except instead of letting their hair down, they just let everybody down: their fans to be exact. Fourth on the book markers list to likely win the tournament, having the youngest squad in the Euros and a largely inexperienced but adventurous side, England once again fail to win their first match in a tournament at the ninth time of asking. On a night when The Three Lions could have used this game as a springboard for the upcoming Derby, they in fact took us back to square one.
Hodgson is the oldest coach in France right now and his poor decision making just served to remind us exactly how old he is. As if his decision to put Kane on set piece duty was not enough despite Kane being one of the biggest aerial threats, his decision to withdraw Rooney was even more peculiar.
Wayne Rooney is undoubtedly England’s most experienced outfield player in France and with a new role as a midfielder, The man with the armband took up this new role quite well. He had two chances, two shots on target and completed 100% of his take ons. He dictated play marvelously from deep spraying passes out wide to perfection to spur Walker and Rose further forward. Moreover he always got back to help in defence. You take off this kind of man and sub him for an adventurous midfielder who lacks the discipline to maintain the team’s shape but is a joy to watch going forward. More often than not he ends up losing the ball.

The other peculiar decision was to start Lallana as part of the front three. The lean framed man had the two best chances of the first half that he completely wasted. He didn’t do Roy a lot of favours by skewing those chances. Only bagged about four goals last season. Looking at the bench, almost every other attacker had more!! But with that kind of finishing, it’s no wonder Lallana is still looking for Goal number one in a three lions shirt. My first candidate to be chalked off for the Wales game.
The other sore thumb was Raheem Sterling’s performance. Having made a bright start to the game, he shockingly faded away from the contest. It was as if the game was a replay because everybody knew what would happen if Sterling got the ball. A Drop of the shoulder, instant speed and a straight run up to the byline, a little bit of twisting and turning before being out muscled, tackled but the bottom line is Raheem losing the ball. What follows is the groan around the stadium and the teenager looking down, ashamed of meeting the searing gaze of his teammates and the cycle continues. The one very clear chance was when England were on a counter. Raheem kept the ball well and dashes about 55 yards. Kyle Walker was making a mad dash screaming for the ball to be delivered into the box. It was a 4 V 3 situation. Sterling ended up losing the ball to the disgust of Walker. If looks could kill, Sterling’s body would have been landing at the Heathrow Airport right about now. Scenes of Roy holding up in frustration like every other England fan inside the Stade Vélodrome when he had the power to make the difference was quite amusing for me.

The brightest point of the game came from the man who plied his trade outside England prior to joining Tottenham; Eric Dier. A lot of my friends ranted on about how playing him as DM would be detrimental to the team despite a stellar season with Spurs. I clearly pointed out how Dier is not your average  Englishman. He is very strong in the air and reads the game with flawlessness and against Russia he showed up; unlike my friends for this 11 am class. Dier casually strolls into the record books for being the first Englishman to score a free kick in the 56 years that the Euros have been in existence. 89% passing accuracy, four clearances, three interceptions and a rocket for a goal, Dier was clearly England’s Knight in shining Jersey. I expect the same show against Wales where he will have Ramsey and Allen for company.

However one dicey area regards Harry Kane. Fresh off becoming the first English in 16 years to win the PL Golden Boot, many expected him to carry on this form to France especially since familiar faces in the shape of Dele Alli, Walker, Dier and Rose would be around him. To my disappointment, Harry just didn’t show up. He had three shots all of which were off target and the question has been floated around: should he start? My answer is definitely yes. To be fair the most clearest of chances didn’t even fall in his way. Lallana hogged them all. Wales also look quite the threat with their big men at the back and there’s no player better at holding up play than Kane. That way Alli and Rooney can get upfront just in case he Tees it up for them. He seemed a man under pressure against Russia. Perhaps he felt the need to prove why he was selected ahead of Vardy and why he’s the man for the job. He just needs to concentrate on bein himself and do what he does best. The goals will come. They always do for Kane.

Roy got his subs very wrong. They were so poor. First was taking off Rooney then also bringing in Milner at LW. Take nothing away from Milner’s industrious nature but I felt a pacy player would have been the right man for that wing. Stats show that Russia were at their highest level of attacking immediately after Milner’s introduction. No points for guessing when they scored.
Milner’s introduction meant England were simply going to sit back and soak in pressure. The aim is to hit on the counter…Something that won’t happen without speedsters. A big mishap on Roy’s part. You don’t back down. You simply don’t. After getting the first goal, you put it another attacker to make sure the opposition are pegged in their half and also stems their counters. You maintain the tempo and pressure until either they crack or you hear the final whistle. Hodgson is too Conservative for this group of players. Not that I am shifting blame on Milner but he did let Gorgi cross the ball for Berezutski to Bury it home.

The back four also let the team down. There was always the fear that England’s visibly young defence would be fragile and could easily switch off. And they didn’t prove the critics wrong. Where were the two centre halves when the tallest Russian player was being marked by the shortest England player? This just depicts carelessness that England still have. Smalling and Cahill should have definitely done better. Hart also had a better chance scoring than coming off his line for that ball.
What is agreed upon is that England should have won. Mistakes were made and against Wales this week, they have the opportunity to blow Group B wide again. Let’s hope Roy gets his tactics right and FFS use folders to store the papers where you write on formations and what have you.